Courtesy TheMarkNews.com
Things have been better for venture
capital in Canada. The industry has been contracting over the past five
years, a trend that accelerated during last year’s financial crisis as
institutional investors started looking for less risky
investments.
A recent study by the Canadian Venture Capital Association showed VC
investment levels at their lowest in 13 years, with Ontario’s numbers
dropping off more steeply than other parts of the country. The CVCA says
that the industry is “in crisis” and has been calling on the Canadian
Government to create a support program to help keep it afloat.
How
are investors responding to this “crisis” and what does it mean for
high growth technology startups in Toronto? As it turns out, the
landscape is changing on both sides of the
equation
and what is emerging is a new kind of startup backed by a new kind of
money.
15 years ago, at the height of the technology bubble, it
wasn’t unusual for a startup to raise between $10 and $15 million in
order to build and release the first version of a product. Today,
startups are getting products to the market on a lot less. “Web-based
infrastructure means technology costs are ten times less than they were.
What cost us $500,000 in 1999 in the form of back office set-up costs,
software development, and licensing can cost less than $10,000 now,”
says David Ceolin, Managing Partner at Innovation Grade Capital, an
active angel investor and entrepreneur who founded a successful startup
in the mid-1990s.
It isn’t just the costs in terms of tools and
people that have changed. The way software gets developed has changed as
well.
Many startups have adopted a new approach to getting a
first version out to customers. Dubbed “lean startups,” these new
companies are focused on getting a stripped-down minimum product to
market as quickly as possible to test the demand and customers’
willingness to pay for it. Only after this link between product and
market has been established are additional resources devoted to trying
to grow the business, including a larger investment in marketing and
sales.
Companies that make it this far are more likely to be
successful, while those that fail to find a market for their product at
least don’t waste as much money on it. “In many cases, the lack of
capital is forcing startups to build highly innovative business models
that are predicated on engaging customers earlier,” says Duncan Hill,
General Partner of Mantella Venture Partners. “This is a great thing for
young companies and will serve them well in the long term.” Derek
Smyth, a Partner at Edgestone Capital, a leading Toronto VC firm agrees.
“It’s a lot cheaper to fail and that’s obviously a good thing.”
The
lean startup approach means that companies are looking for smaller seed
investments. This puts them outside the domain of traditional Toronto
venture capital that typically invests larger amounts of money once the
company has a proven product or an established stream of revenue.
One
group filling the gap are “angel investors.” These are typically
successful entrepreneurs that invest a smaller amount of capital while
providing the benefit of both their experience and network of business
contacts. And unlike VCs, angels typically do not take a large ownership
stake in the company. “A company can now get down the highway quite far
with a small round of well-connected angels, under better, less
punitive terms than they used to get from VCs,” says Ceolin.
Toronto
is also seeing a new type of fund emerge that is focused on making
fewer, smaller investments and takes a more active approach to working
with companies. Working with a smaller portfolio of companies, these
funds are actively involved in the operations of each of their
investments, working with startups at the early stages and leaving later
stage investments, if needed, to traditional VCs. “Angel and other seed
investment sources have become much more critical to the success of the
web startup community,” says Rob Hyndman, technology business lawyer
and co-founder of mesh, Canada’s leading web conference. “Traditional
sources of financing, such as venture capital, have become less
relevant, at least until later in the life-cycle.”
So, could the
VC “crisis” in Canada eventually result in a wave of more
customer-oriented startups backed by more committed, hands-on investors?
Those in the community warn that it is still too early to tell, but the
signs are encouraging. “I'm convinced that to build a self-sustaining
innovation economy, we need to commit to the long-haul,” says Hyndman.
“We need to help a generation or two of entrepreneurs achieve success.
When they do, they will be back to invest intelligently in the next
generation.”
The Mark
is Canada's online forum for news commentary and analysis.