Courtesy TheMarkNews.com
Every discussion of Toronto’s future
tends to identify a similar set of daunting challenges. In no
particular order, these typically include: the annual budget gap
between spending and revenue; making the post-amalgamation
mega-bureaucracy more responsive to citizens; re-invigorating
regionalism in the GTA; making better use of our extraordinarily
diverse human capital; facing the increasing income polarization
across the
city and
the resulting lack of affordable housing; lessening our dependence on
cars and fossil fuel; and dealing with our waste.
This
intimidating list could easily be cause for despair. Yet these
discussions usually end with the fierce affirmation that,
notwithstanding all of the above, Toronto is a remarkable city with an
engaged, resourceful, and talented population and we are, for the most
part, grateful to be here. The challenge lies in bridging this
gap—strengthening our resolve to forge ahead despite the sometimes
fatalistic perception that there is little room to maneuver when so
much is blocked and under-resourced.
While it is certainly
true that our city (and other Canadian cities as well) is an
underfunded net exporter of wealth that has been shortchanged on the
resources it should be getting back from senior levels of government,
this is not the whole story. There are many things that we can do for
ourselves. Untapped potential can often be found by using the assets we
already have to greater advantage. The first should be to throw
open the doors of city hall to civil society.
The
city continues to pass over many opportunities to embrace the active
and engaged civil society in our midst, These motivated, inventive, and
agile civic actors can dramatically enhance the capacity of government
by rapidly bringing different parties to enlarged tables. We need to
get beyond our traditional limiting stance that government should do it
alone.
We already have a wealth of highly motivated and
skilled civic entrepreneurs and innovators who have already formed
powerful and effective umbrella groups. These include the Toronto City
Summit Alliance, whose impressive accomplishments include DiverseCity,
Greening Toronto, and the Emerging Leaders Network, and civic actors
like the Canadian Urban Institute, the City Centre Institute at U of T,
and People Plan Toronto, among many others. To date, the reception at
City Hall has been chilly. It is time for that to change.
In a
small but telling example, City Council recently reversed the draconian
administrative decision to forbid all skating on ponds, originally done
to limit liabilities and save the cost of testing the ice, and is now
seeking partners to better make use of community capacity. Similarly,
there was a successful community-led campaign to keep swimming pools
open. Meanwhile, neighbourhood groups across the city are forming
“friends of” groups and associations to play key stewardship roles for
their local parks. Efforts like these should be welcomed.
Deeper
and broader bottom up citizen involvement to complement top down
government programs will not only allow us to do more with less, but
will also greatly enhance our capacity for honest public discussion of
hard issues and thoughtful risk-taking on seemingly intractable issues.
But to make this work, there will need to be some changes in the way
municipal government works to overcome a growing sense of alienation
and frustration among regular citizens.
Many Torontonians are
starting to realize that our amalgamated city is simultaneously too big
and remote and too small and insular to make many decisions
effectively. To really make it work, we have to break it down into
smaller knowable units to empower neighbourhoods and give meaningful
access to City Hall. The Community Boards of New York provide a good
model for this. At the same time, we need to look at the big picture
and strengthen constituencies for regional cooperation across current
municipal boundaries.
In the planning arena, we desperately need
to restore “home rule.” Our continuing subjugation to the Ontario
Municipal Board has led to an enormous and unhelpful diversion of
resources and attention. We have to extricate ourselves from its
clutches and take back the planning reins to proactively guide change,
not let it be decided by litigious skirmishes with unpredictable
outcomes. The province has given Toronto an opportunity to wean itself
from this embarrassing subservience and we need to take advantage of
it.
The people of Toronto are doing all kinds of extraordinary
things. It only makes sense to harness that energy for the good of the
entire city.
The Mark is Canada's online forum for news commentary and analysis.